An Investigation into the Wrongful Management Practices of Southeast Observer Programs

In September, 2011, a Southeast Fisheries Observer in the Pelagic Observer Program came forward to APO with allegations of broad-scale mismanagement of observer programs in the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Southeast Observer Programs. We contacted other observers (current and former) and found out that the problems were not just limited to the POP but region-wide. We brought this to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility who assisted us in filing a complaint with NOAA's Office of Inspector General (OIG), requesting an investigation. The allegations against NMFS included: Ignoring witnessed violations by fisheries observers; failure to enforce laws that support the safety and welfare of observers; ignoring plastics pollution reported by observers; ignoring the dangers of the BP oil spill exposure to observers; and blackballing fisheries observers if they refuse unsafe trips or otherwise question program management. Please see the press release here.

Unfortunately,the OIG responded by vetting the investigation to NMFS, the very agency accused of wrongdoing. Here is their summary. The rest of the report is as follows:

Appendix 1: APO/PEER Complaint

Appendix 2-4: SE Observer Program Internal Controls

Appendix 5: Observer Harassment Cases

Appendix 6-8: Investigative Team Timeline; BP Oil Spill E-mails; Questionnaire

Appendix 9: SE NMFS Staff Interview Questions

Appendix 10: Incidental Take Permit Issues

Appendix 11: Observer Responses

Appendix 12: Observer Accommodation Violations; Declaration claiming independence of investigative team (note the absence of the third investigator, the NMFS SE Director).

The OIG shortly redacted the entire report and instead directed NMFS to conduct a national review of all observer program management practices in the US. This had the effect of merely reporting on management practices, diluting regionally rogue federal practices and not requiring any changes or reports, as in the original report.

Recent Posts

See All

Electronic Monitoring - at what cost?

Electronic monitoring (EM) is a rapidly developing technology to monitor fisheries, where industry can possibly save costs or in situations where it is either impossible or dangerous for observer plac

Observer Safety Measures - WCPFC

WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC FISHERIES COMMISSION (WCPFC) OBSERVER SAFETY MEASURES: The WCPFC has made several advances on observer safety since 2015. WCPFC12, Bali, Indonesia, 3-8 December 2015: Spe

Public Access to Observer Data and Information

Public Access to Observer Data and Information critical to not only the ability to measure impacts of fishing on the marine environment but also to ensure that observers are able to carry out their du


Our goal is to provide a comprehensive source of information for observers, and the public, on issues related to fishery observer programs.

Get social with us!
  • Facebook Clean Grey
Share your thoughts!

Email :


© 2023 by APO. Proudly created with